LETTERS WE WILL NEVER SEND
Energy Corporations Face Mounting Evidence of Climate Impact
To energy corporations,
Your operations are under scrutiny as global temperatures show an irrefutable upward trend, with 2025 marking another record-breaking year for average global temperature—1.3 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. Despite commitments made under international frameworks, carbon emissions from energy production remain alarmingly high. In 2025, global CO2 emissions reached 38.5 billion metric tons, an increase of 0.9% over the previous year. This trajectory contradicts the target pathways outlined in the IPCC’s most recent assessments, which dictate a need for a 45% reduction in emissions by 2030 to maintain a 1.5-degree Celsius warming threshold.
Coal remains a significant contributor, accounting for 36% of global energy-related emissions last year. Investment in coal-fired power plants, particularly in emerging markets, continues to rise. The installed coal capacity in these regions expanded by 5.8% in 2025, driven by energy security interests and short-term economic gains. Meanwhile, oil production saw an increase of approximately 2.3%, reinforced by sustained global demand. Natural gas, often promoted as a "bridge fuel," saw a 4.1% increase in production, despite methane losses from extraction processes that dramatically undermine its lower-carbon reputation.
Your commitments to transitioning towards renewable energy sources are outpaced by the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure. The International Energy Agency reported that investment in renewables in 2025 accounted for merely 34% of total energy sector investments, failing to reflect the urgency outlined by the scientific community. This lag in renewable investment is inconsistent with the technological feasibility and economic viability of these energy solutions. Photovoltaic and wind energy technologies have achieved cost competitiveness with fossil fuels in numerous markets, yet deployment rates remain insufficient.
Biodiversity loss, linked closely to climate change, reflects your industry's broader environmental impact. The 2025 Living Planet Index reported a 69% decline in global vertebrate populations since 1970, correlating directly with habitat destruction fueled by energy extraction operations. Deforestation, often linked to coal and biofuel feedstock production, remains a major ecological pressure point, releasing approximately 4.3 billion metric tons of CO2 annually over the past decade.
Current adaptation and mitigation strategies offered in corporate sustainability reports often lack quantifiable targets and timelines. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, which remain a focal point in your climate strategies, have yet to reach operational scales necessary for significant atmospheric CO2 reduction. With only 27% of CCS projects achieving their projected capacities, reliance on this technology, in its current form, appears premature.
Policy implementation gaps compound these challenges. Your influence on regulatory frameworks remains significant, with lobbying expenditures reaching an estimated $6.3 billion in 2025 within leading economies. This financial leverage emphasizes short-term economic interests over long-term planetary stability. Regulatory bodies have thus far failed to enforce stringent limits on emissions, leaving voluntary corporate pledges as the primary mechanism for climate action.
The trajectory of climate-related impacts is clear. The World Meteorological Organization predicts that by 2030, over 300 million people will face chronic water scarcity due to altered precipitation patterns, an increase of 23% from current levels. Rising sea levels are projected to displace approximately 200 million individuals by mid-century, directly threatening coastal infrastructure, much of which supports your industry’s operations.
The evidence points to a critical need for a paradigm shift in energy production and consumption. The current data underscores an unsustainable trajectory that is incompatible with the preservation of ecological and human systems. The path forward requires a comprehensive reevaluation of energy strategies, with investment and innovation directed decisively toward low-carbon and sustainable technologies.
Observed and filed, EMBER Staff Writer, Abiogenesis